Legal Opinion

Dimogerondakis v. Dimogerondakis

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided July 18, 1984PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

197 N.J. Super. 518 (1984)

485 A.2d 338

CATHERINE DIMOGERONDAKIS AND GEORGE DIMOGERONDAKIS, PLAINTIFFS,

v.

ANTONIOS DIMOGERONDAKIS AND JAMES H. SURRETT, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division Morris County.

Decided July 18, 1984.

Andreas A. Boyadjis for plaintiffs.

Kevin A. Couch for defendant Dimogerondakis (O'Donnell, McCord, Leslie & O'Toole, attorneys).

OPINION

MacKENZIE, J.S.C.

An ultimate outcome charge[1] is generally required when a plaintiff and one or more defendants are causally negligent. Roman v. Mitchell, 82 N.J. 336 (1980).[2] The rationale is that a jury will better…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cartel Capital Corp. v. Fireco of New JerseySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  2. Theobald v. AngelosSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  3. Roman v. MitchellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  4. Rogers v. SpadyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
  5. Tefft v. TefftNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. MejiaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  2. Blazovic v. AndrichSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
  3. Fischer v. CanarioSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
  4. Taylor v. Celotex Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Young v. LattaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API