Legal Opinion
Wilderness Society, Inc. v. Rey
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 22, 2010No. 06-35565PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
McKEOWN, Circuit Judge:
The Forest Service Decisionmaking and Appeals Reform Act (“ARA”), requires the Secretary of Agriculture to establish notice and comment procedures through the Chief of the United States Forest Service for proposed decisions related to “projects and activities implementing land and resource management plans.” Pub.L. No. 102-381, § 322, 106 Stat. 1419 (1992) (codified as 16 U.S.C. § 1612 note). The Act also requires the Secretary to modify the appeals procedure for decisions concerning these projects. Id. In 2003, the Forest Service revised the regulations…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Summers v. Earth Island InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Havens Realty Corp. v. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Newman-Green, Inc. v. Alfonzo-LarrainSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Davidson v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Cottonwood Environmental Law Center v. United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Fellowship of Christian Athletes v. San Jose Unified School District Board of EducatioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- Los Angeles Haven Hospice, Inc. v. SebeliusCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Pacific Rivers Council v. United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.