Legal Opinion

O-Kay Shoes, Inc. v. Rosewell

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 18, 1984No. 83—3097, 84—0017 consPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stamos

Plaintiff commenced this action against the treasurer of Cook County seeking individual and class relief to recover the income earned by the treasurer on condemnation judgment awards from the date of deposit by the condemning authority to the date of distribution to the condemnees. The trial court entered judgment in favor of the individual plaintiff, determined that the suit met the prerequisites for maintenance as a class action and conducted an accounting to determine class recovery. Defendant appeals.

On March 4, 1982, plaintiff, O-Kay Shoes, Inc., filed a class action complaint for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Steinberg v. Chicago Medical SchoolIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  2. City of Elmhurst v. KegerreisIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Morton Grove Park District v. American National Bank & Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1980
  4. McCabe v. BurgessIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Hunter v. TroupIllinois Supreme Court · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Charles Hester Enterprises, Inc. v. Illinois Founders InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  2. Eshaghi v. Hanley Dawson Cadillac Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  3. Valasquez v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  4. Eshaghi v. Hanley Dawson Cadillac Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API