Legal Opinion

Gay v. Paige

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1907No. Docket No. 146PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Wayne; Hosmer, J. Assumpsit by Joel R. Gay against Fred O. Paige for services rendered. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.

During the year 1900, the appellee, Gay, was employed by the appellant, Paige, who at that time was State manager of the Mutual Life-Insurance Company of New York, for the State of Michigan, as his agency director of the Grand Rapids agency, and in November in that year, they entered into a written contract, whereby appellee was appointed superintendent of agents for appellant over the southern peninsula of Michigan, *464upon a salary and bonus. This contract was for one year, and further provided that appellee’s work as superintendent of agents would at all times be subject to appellant’s…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lewis v. LoperU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1893

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Heckscher v. BlantonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API