Heckscher v. Blanton
Supreme Court of Virginia
Appeal from a decree of the Law and Equity Court of the. city of Richmond, in two causes heard together. Decree in favor of defendants, J. Thompson Brown & Co., who were defendants in both suits. Complainants appeal.
1Opinion of the Court
Br the Court.
These cases, heard together, have been most elaborately and ably argued upon the printed briefs, as well as orally, and a *650great number of authorities cited, but in our view the issues involved lie within a rather narrow compass.
The pleadings, original, amended and supplemental, put in issue whether or not the complainants have the right to require J. W. Blanton and J. Thompson Brown & Co. (hereiuafter spoken of for convenience as Brown & Co.) to account to complainants for a certain commission — $10,000—received by Brown & Co., and afterwards divided with Blanton, for services in…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Max Meadows Land & Improvement Co. v. BradySupreme Court of Virginia · 1895
- Tennant v. DunlopSupreme Court of Virginia · 1899
- Alexander v. North-Western Christian UniversityIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
- Adams v. GuerardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1860
- Hurt v. MillerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1897
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Tube City Mining & Milling Co. v. OttersonArizona Supreme Court · 1914
- White v. BottSupreme Court of Virginia · 1931
- Zogg v. HedgesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1944
- County Board of Arlington County v. Kent Stores of Washington, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1955
- Farmers State Bank v. Miner (In Re Monson)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.