Legal Opinion
King v. Caruso
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided March 19, 2008No. Civil 07-11810PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT
FEIKENS, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is the report and recommendation issued on January 18, 2008 by Magistrate Judge Steven D. Pepe, recommending that I grant summary judgment to the Defendants in this matter. On January 28, 2008, Plaintiff Cheryl King (King) filed timely objections. There is no response to King’s objections, and the time for doing so has elapsed. Having reviewed the briefs, the court concludes that a hearing is unnecessary. See E.D. Mich. LR 7.1(e)(2). For the reasons stated below, the court…
2Cases cited65 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Chapman v. BracyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2020
- Edwards v. TurnerDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2020
- Lewis v. Sole Law, PLLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2023
- Rashad Ramon Ivy v. William Bolin; Margit Heald; Christian Dobratz; Rick Raven; Daniel Moe; Corey Anderson-Moe; Jenny Carufel; Jeff White; Bronson Austregn; Eric Nelson; Kelly McElroy; Danielle Reed; Amanda Hofer; Chad Oye; and Kate RudesillDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2026
- Robinson v. SheldonDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.