Legal Opinion

Gonzalez v. Interstate Guaranty Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1933No. Docket No. S.F. 14774PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLangdon, J.

This in an action to cancel a note and deed of trust given as security therefor. Plaintiffs, husband and wife, both unfamiliar with business transactions, were solicited by one F. Vergel De Dios, a salesman in the employ of defendant Interstate Guaranty Company, to buy an “undivided interest” in the said company for $500. Acting in reliance upon, the false representations of De Dios that he would cause such interest to be transferred to them, they executed the note and deed of trust, De Dios signing the note as a joint maker. De Dios took the instruments to defendant company, which issued a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McKenney v. EllsworthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Live Oak Cemetery Assn. v. AdamsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. Masten v. Fox West Coast TheatresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sanders v. MagillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Frankish v. Federal Mortgage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API