Legal Opinion

Marlatt v. Elliott

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 11, 1904No. 13,666PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Error from Riley district court; Sam. Kimble, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Cunningham, J. :

P. B. Elliot recovered judgment against A. N Marlatt in the sum of $240 for services rendered as a real-estate agent in selling a farm belonging to Marlatt to J. E. Conroy, the recovery being two per cent, of $12,000, the amount for which the land was sold. The theory of the plaintiff upon which he based his right of recovery was that he had brought to the attention of the purchaser the land of the de-. fendant, and that, although subsequently the defendant had himself consummated the sale, still his services had been the procuring…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Plant v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
  2. J. F. Aigler & Co. v. Carpenter Place Land Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1893
  3. Davis v. L. W. Lawrence & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1893
  4. Ratts v. Shepherd, Bucher & McCownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hiniger v. JudySupreme Court of Kansas · 1965
  2. Beougher v. ClarkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  3. Grimes v. EmerySupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  4. Connelly v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Mitchell v. Derby Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1925

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API