Marlatt v. Elliott
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Riley district court; Sam. Kimble, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Cunningham, J. :
P. B. Elliot recovered judgment against A. N Marlatt in the sum of $240 for services rendered as a real-estate agent in selling a farm belonging to Marlatt to J. E. Conroy, the recovery being two per cent, of $12,000, the amount for which the land was sold. The theory of the plaintiff upon which he based his right of recovery was that he had brought to the attention of the purchaser the land of the de-. fendant, and that, although subsequently the defendant had himself consummated the sale, still his services had been the procuring…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Plant v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
- J. F. Aigler & Co. v. Carpenter Place Land Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1893
- Davis v. L. W. Lawrence & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1893
- Ratts v. Shepherd, Bucher & McCownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
3Cited by14 opinions
- Hiniger v. JudySupreme Court of Kansas · 1965
- Beougher v. ClarkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
- Grimes v. EmerySupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
- Connelly v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Mitchell v. Derby Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1925
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.