Legal Opinion

Duffey v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 23, 1917No. 8320Published

Accusation of larceny; from city court of Carrollton—Judge Beall. October 20, 1916.

1Opinion of the Court

,Wade, C. J.

1. The bill of exceptions was not sued out in time to preserve the exception therein based upon the overruling of a demurrer to the accusation, and. there was no exception pendente lite. The assignment of error upon the same ground, which appears in the motion for a new trial, can not be considered. Redwine v. Street, 18 Ga. App. 77 (89 S. E. 163) ; Kent v. State, 15 Ga. App. 210 (82 S. E. 762) ; Wills v. Young, 15 Ga. App. 352 (83 S. E. 275); Coulson v. State, 13 Ga. App. 148 (2), 150 (78 S. E. 1108), and cases there cited; Mayor &c. of Dublin v. Dudley, 2 Ga. App. 762 (59 S. E.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mayor of Dublin v. DudleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  2. Coulson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
  3. Redwine Bros. v. StreetCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
  4. Wills v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
  5. Kent v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API