Legal Opinion

Redwine Bros. v. Street

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 18, 1916No. 6869PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Action on bond; from city court of Greenville — Judge Revill. January 21, 1915.

1Opinion of the CourtRussell, C. J.

The fi. fa. -which was the basis of the action now before us has heretofore been before this court. Redwine v. Jarrell, 14 Ga. App. 294 (80 S. E. 728). Epon the levy of the fi. fa. the defendant Street gave a forthcoming bond, with Clark and Crouch as his securities. The instant action is a suit for a breach of that bond. It appears that the defendants relied, among other defenses, upon a plea that the plaintiffs were estopped to set up a breach of the forthcoming bond, so far as certain seed-cotton included in the levy was concerned, and also upon the contention that even if there had been a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mayor of Dublin v. DudleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  2. Redwine Bros. v. JarrellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
  3. Barnes v. VandiverCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  4. Grace v. FinleysonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rome Builders Supply, Inc. v. Rome Kraft Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  2. Boyd v. CrewsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  3. Hetrick v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
  4. Gonzales v. VargoArizona Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Duffey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API