Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Carey v. Schroeder Mining Company

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1955No. 2683PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Riner, Chief Justice.

This is a case arising under the Workmen’s Compensation Law of the State of Wyoming, W.C.S. 1945, § 72-101 et seq., and the facts thereof are substantially as follows: The claimant, Leo Carey of Guernsey, Wyoming, is a married man with a wife and four children as dependents. He was employed by the Schroeder Mining Company — processing ore east of Guernsey about one and a half miles. His employment was that of a truck driver, having been in their employ for about six months. He was struck by lightning while in the office of the company after he had made out his time…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Caswell's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  2. De Luca v. Board of Park CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
  3. Matter of Madura v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
  4. Bauer's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  5. Emmick v. Hanrahan Brick & Ice Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Worker's Compensation Claim of Haagensen v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Archuleta v. Carbon County School District No. 1Wyoming Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Workers' Compensation Claim of Seckman v. Wyo-Ben, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Williams v. Northern Development Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Terry J. Leal and Dustin Kopp v. State of Wyoming, ex rel. Department of Workforce Services, Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2024

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API