Legal Opinion

United States v. George J. Hykel

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided May 23, 1972No. 71-2091PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

HUNTER, Circuit Judge.

Appellant George J. Hykel was convicted for violating 18 U.S.C. § 1006, which forbids, inter alia, officers of federally-insured savings and loan associations from participating “directly or indirectly” in any loan by the savings and loan association, with intent to defraud. 1 It is argued on this appeal that the evidence was insufficient to support the conviction, and that certain of the District Court’s evidentiary rulings require a new trial. We find these arguments without merit, and accordingly affirm.

I. SUFFICIENCY OF THE EVIDENCE

18 U.S.C. §…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Michelson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Alford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. United States v. Yves Glaziou and Rene L. A. LemieuxCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
  5. United States v. RiccardiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. United States v. Irie E. Leonard, United States of America v. James L. SarvisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
  2. United States v. Ronald C. Brechtel and Phillip H. GattusoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  3. United States v. Joseph Chrzanowski, in No. 73-1591, and Alex Chrzanowski. Appeal of Alex Chrzanowski, in No. 73-1592Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
  4. State v. KingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
  5. Government of the Virgin Islands v. GrantDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1984

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API