United States v. George J. Hykel
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
HUNTER, Circuit Judge.
Appellant George J. Hykel was convicted for violating 18 U.S.C. § 1006, which forbids, inter alia, officers of federally-insured savings and loan associations from participating “directly or indirectly” in any loan by the savings and loan association, with intent to defraud. 1 It is argued on this appeal that the evidence was insufficient to support the conviction, and that certain of the District Court’s evidentiary rulings require a new trial. We find these arguments without merit, and accordingly affirm.
I. SUFFICIENCY OF THE EVIDENCE
18 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Michelson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Alford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- United States v. Yves Glaziou and Rene L. A. LemieuxCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- United States v. RiccardiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- United States v. Irie E. Leonard, United States of America v. James L. SarvisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Ronald C. Brechtel and Phillip H. GattusoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Joseph Chrzanowski, in No. 73-1591, and Alex Chrzanowski. Appeal of Alex Chrzanowski, in No. 73-1592Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- State v. KingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
- Government of the Virgin Islands v. GrantDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1984
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.