Legal Opinion

Hansen v. Storm

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1959Published

1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.

This is a motion by defendants to sever the action in respect of each of the plaintiffs, to permit defendants to interpose against plaintiff Hansen a supplemental counterclaim and to direct plaintiff Hansen to reply to such counterclaim.

The suit is to declare void for usury certain negotiable promissory notes made by plaintiffs to the order of defendants’ testatrix. The present answer denies usury, counterclaims for an unpaid balance of principal, and alleges as affirmative defenses that the notes were given as collateral security for an advance to a third person, and estoppel. The proposed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Harriss v. TamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  2. Stroock & Co. v. Lichtenthal, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
  3. Smith v. SnowberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API