Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Campbell v. Southland Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 23, 1994No. 9003-01809; CA A75708Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partLandau, J.

I agree with the majority in affirming the trial court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of defendant on plaintiffs’ breach of contract and wrongful termination claims. I disagree with the majority in reversing the trial court’s similar disposition of the misrepresentation and franchise law claims. Accordingly, I dissent from that portion of the majority’s opinion.

*105Plaintiffs allege that they are entitled to damages on their misrepresentation claim, because defendant approved their proposed business plan, which estimated that they would need to generate $3,400 monthly net income from the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Seeborg v. General Motors CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Webb v. ClarkOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Holland v. LentzOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Federici Et Ux v. LehmanOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Patterson v. Western Loan & Building Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API