Keesee v. May

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Rees

Affirming.

The appellant, Myrtle Keesee, the plaintiff below, brought this action against her former husband, L. J. May, to recover on a note for $1,000 alleged to have been executed and delivered to her by the defendant on March 6, 1934. The defendant, in his answer, alleged that the note was procured by fraud and was without consideration. On the trial of the case the jury returned a verdict for the defendant, and, from the judgment entered thereon, the plaintiff has appealed. The grounds urged for reversal of the judgment are that certain evidence introduced…