Lane v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
CASE 63. — PROSECUTION AGAINST JAMES LANE FOR ARSON AND CONSPIRACY TO BURN A DWELLING.— Appeal from Estill Circuit Court. Defendant convicted and appeals. —
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the court by
Judge Settle
— Reversing.
Appellant was separately tried in the Estill Circuit Court under an indictment charging him, his wife, Callie Lane, Jack Hawkins, and Armilda Roberts *521with the crime of house burning in pursuance of a conspiracy entered into and existing between them; the act of setting fire to the house having, as alleged in the indictment, been assigned by agreement among the conspirators to Jack Hawkins by whom it was performed. The trial resulted in appellant’s conviction and the fixing of his punishment at confinement in the penitentiary five years.
The…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Howard v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901
- Blackburn v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1876
- Howard v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1902
- Bowling v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1881
- McBride v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1868
3Cited by13 opinions
- Shell v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
- Renaker v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
- Logan v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
- Smith v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
- State v. ElwellOregon Supreme Court · 1922
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.