Progressive Life Insurance v. Bohannon
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.
We will discuss grounds 1, 2, and 8 of the demurrer together. These grounds attack the petition because the plaintiff had no right to maintain the action since the policy was not assigned in compliance with a stipulation in the policy concerning the assignment of the policy. The policy provides: “No assignment of this policy shall be binding upon the company unless filed in duplicate at the home office, one to be retained by the company, and the other to be returned to the insured. The company assumes no responsibility for the validity of the assignment.” In Steele v. Gatlin, 115 Ga. 929, 931…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Georgia Co-Operative Fire Ass'n v. Borchardt & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Adams v. Washington Fidelity National InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- Steele v. GatlinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Kelley v. Carolina Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
- Causey v. Gulf Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Estate of Bean v. HazelSupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
- Progressive Life Ins. Co. v. BohannonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
- Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. BennettDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1968
- Estate of Bean v. HazelSupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
- Progressive Life Insurance v. BohannonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947