Legal Opinion

United States v. Rogelio Gomez Torres

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided March 18, 1992No. 91-1028PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McWILLIAMS, Circuit Judge.

Rogelio Gomez Torres and Florentino So-ria were jointly charged in a two-count indictment as follows: (1) in count one the two were charged with unlawfully conspiring on or about July 31, 1990, to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846; and (2) in count two they were charged with unlawfully distributing cocaine on or about July 31, 1990, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. The district court granted Soria’s motion for a severance and accordingly Torres was tried separately. The jury convicted Torres on both counts and he was sentenced…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Richard Donald LonedogCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  2. United States v. Phil Pinelli, David Pinelli, Robert Sheehan, Martin Mosko, Thomas Gottone, William Burbidge, and Aaron MoskoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
  3. United States v. Florentino SoriaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. GabaldonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  2. United States of America, Plaintiff/appellee/cross-Appellant v. Tommy Blake McCary Defendant/appellant/ Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  3. United States v. MeridythCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
  4. Zuern v. TateDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2000
  5. United States v. Florentino SoriaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API