Legal Opinion

United States v. Phil Pinelli, David Pinelli, Robert Sheehan, Martin Mosko, Thomas Gottone, William Burbidge, and Aaron Mosko

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided December 12, 1989No. 87-2511, 87-2513, 87-2565, 87-2582, 87-2610, 87-2616 and 87-2678PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, District Judge, sitting by designation.

This gambling prosecution stems from a thirty-five (35) count indictment returned by a federal grand jury sitting in Colorado on February 5, 1986. The indictment charged fourteen defendants, including the seven appellants here, with violating several federal criminal statutes. The pertinent statutes on appeal are 18 U.S.C. § 1955 (operating an illegal gambling business in violation of the laws of Colorado, involving five or more persons, with gross wagers in excess of $2,000 on any single day), 18 U.S.C. § 1952 (interstate use of a telephone to…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. United States v. Mandell Jackson, Joseph Davis, and Romano GinesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  2. United States v. CeballosCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  3. United States v. Mark A. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  4. United States v. Victor Manuel Meraz-ValetaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  5. United States of America, and Cross-Appellee v. Paul D. Wood, and Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API