Legal Opinion

Reed v. Goertz

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 23, 2026No. 24-1268Relating-to

1Opinion of the Court

Cite as:

607 U. S. ____

(2026) 1 SOTOMAYOR, J., dissenting SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES RODNEY REED v. BRYAN GOERTZ, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF BASTROP COUNTY, TEXAS ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 24–1268. Decided March 23, 2026 The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR, with whom JUSTICE KAGAN and JUSTICE JACKSON join, dissenting from the denial of certio- rari. “DNA testing has an unparalleled ability to both exoner- ate the wrongly convicted and to identify the guilty.”…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Herrera v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Holmes v. South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. District Attorney's Office for the Third Judicial District v. OsborneSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API