SAIF Corp. v. Frank
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.
SAIF Corporation (SAIF) seeks review of a Workers’ Compensation Board order in which the Board ruled that claimant was entitled to permanent disability compensation without first proving a “permanent worsening” of his compensable condition. We review for errors of law, ORS 183.482(8)(a), and affirm.
Claimant sustained a compensable low back injury on October 18,1992, which SAIF accepted as a nondisabling lumbosacral strain. SAIF paid for claimant’s chiropractic treatment through August 1993. On July 27,1994, claimant reinjured his low back and filed a new injury claim, which SAIF denied.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Smith v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1986
- Stepp v. SAIF Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1987
- Fred Meyer, Inc. v. FarrowCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- Rogers v. Hewlett-Packard Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
3Cited by1 opinion
- Rogers v. Hewlett-Packard Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1998