Legal Opinion

Gaylen MacHinery Corporation v. Pitman-Moore Company

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 24, 1959No. 25572_1PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Circuit Judge.

This action is based on defendant’s written promise to pay a 10 per cent commission if plaintiff succeeded in obtaining an order for Salk vaccine from the Argentine Government. It was originally brought in the Supreme Court of New York and was removed to the court below by the defendant because of the diverse citizenship of the parties. At the close of plaintiff’s case defendant elected to stand on its motion for a directed verdict. The case was then submitted to a jury, which returned a plaintiff’s verdict, upon which the court entered judgment. Defendant’s motion under…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hornstein v. PodwitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Lobel v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
  3. Colvin v. . Post Mortgage Land Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
  4. Goodman v. Marcol, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1933
  5. Salzano v. PellilloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sears, Roebuck And Company v. Teamsters Local Union No. 243Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
  2. Leen v. Butter Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993
  3. Sears v. Teamsters Local Union No. 243Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API