Legal Opinion

IMS Health Corp. v. Schneider

District Court, D. Maine

Decided September 28, 2012No. 1:07-cv-00127-JAWPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES

JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR., Chief Judge.

Following their First Amendment victory, the Plaintiffs filed a motion and supplemental motion, requesting that the Court order the state of Maine to pay them $1,307,252.15 in attorneys’ fees, expenses, and costs. The Court awards $678,189.64 in fees and expenses.

I. INTRODUCTION

Under the law, the Plaintiffs in this case are clearly entitled to an award of attorneys’ fees against the state of Maine. Congress enacted 42 U.S.C. § 1988 to ensure “effective access to the judicial process for persons with civil rights…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Blanchard v. BergeronSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Fox v. ViceSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rand v. Town of ExeterDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2014
  2. ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY v. ELECTRICITY MAINE LLCDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API