Legal Opinion

Salo v. Smith

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 7, 1914No. Civ. No. 1226PublishedCited by 1 opinion

The facts are stated' in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

This is an action for damages for the wrongful detention of the person of the plaintiff, and grows out of the arrest of the plaintiff by the defendant, Smith, as sheriff, and the failure of that official to comply with the mandates of section 849 of the Penal Code, which provides: “When an arrest is made without a warrant by a peace officer or private person, the person arrested must, without unnecessary delay, be taken before the nearest or most accessible magistrate in the county in which the arrest is made, and an information, stating the charge against the person, must be laid before such…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Taylor v. HearstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Clancy v. PloverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Lick v. OwenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Von Schroeder v. SpreckelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Page v. MitchellMichigan Supreme Court · 1864

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. MacDonald v. SchenkelCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API