Legal Opinion

Von Schroeder v. Spreckels

California Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1905No. S.F. No. 3382PublishedCited by 7 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Marin County granting a new trial. F. M. Angellotti, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This was an action to recover damages for libel. The cause was tried before a jury, which rendered a verdict for defendant, and plaintiff moved for a new trial. The court granted a new trial, and from its order so made defendant appeals. The order of the court granting a new trial was general. It is well settled that this court will not reverse such an order unless it appears that the order itself was an abuse of discretion. (Cole v. Wilcox, 99 Cal. 552, [34 Pac. 114]; Brooks v. San Francisco etc. Ry. Co., 110 Cal. 178, [42 Pac. 570].) It cannot be said in this case that any such…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Taylor v. HearstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Kenyon v. Western Union Tel. Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Brooks v. San Francisco & North Pacific Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Clancy v. PloverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Lick v. OwenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Merralls v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Colon v. TosettiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
  3. Waltz v. SilveriaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
  4. Buckley v. County of MarinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
  5. Crouse-Prouty v. RogersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API