Legal Opinion

Town of Gypsum v. Lundgren

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 15, 1916No. 8580PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Eagle Coimty Court. Hon. L. B. Tague, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hill

The defendants in error petitioned for and secured a decree disconnecting from the incorporated Town of Gypsum, 29.25 acres of land belonging to them. The town’s contention is that their showing was insufficient in one respect, to satisfy the requirements of chapter 52, sec.l, p. 154 Laws 1913, under which the action was brought. It is admitted that Lundgren owns fourteen and a fraction acres of this land, Thomas, seven and a fraction, and Muckey the balance* and that each has no interest in the lands of the *333other. It is also admitted that the north and east sides oí the Lundgren tract border…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. MorganAppellate Court of Illinois · 1901
  2. Oehler v. Big Stone CitySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Reichelt v. Town of JulesburgSupreme Court of Colorado · 1932
  2. First National Bank v. Village of South PekinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1940
  3. In re the Disconnection of Part of the Territory of West Jordan, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API