Legal Opinion

Oehler v. Big Stone City

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1902PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from circuit court, Grant county. Hon. A. W. Campbell, Judge. Petition by William Oehler and others to disconnect and exclude certain property from the corporate limits of Big Stone City. From a judgment in favor of plaintiffs, the city appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtCorson, J.

The plaintiffs, claiming to be the owners of certain lands not platted into lots and blocks within the city limits of defendant city and on the borders thereof, presented a petition to the city council of said city, in which they represented that they were the owners of all the lands described in the petition, and that they constituted more than three-fourths of the legal voters within the territory uherein described, and prayed that the same might be disconnected and excluded from the corporate limits of said city. The city council denied the request of said petitioners, and thereafter, in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stewart v. AdamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
  2. Versailles BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Zajicek v. City of WessingtonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Waring v. Town of South Sioux FallsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Town of Gypsum v. LundgrenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1916
  4. Camus v. Big Stone CitySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Kaiser v. Town of RaviniaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API