Duvall v. Kroger Co.
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CONOVER, Judge.
Plaintiffs-Appellants David F. Duvall (Duvall) and Pauline E. Duvall appeal the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendant-Appellee, The Kroger Company (Kroger), in an action for malicious prosecution and false imprisonment.
We affirm.
Duvall presents the following restated issues for our review:
1. whether probable cause is a question of fact rendering the trial court’s grant of summary judgment improper;
2. whether the trial court erred in concluding Duvall’s criminal prosecution was not terminated in his favor; and
3. whether the trial court erred in granting…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Jerome Singleton v. City of New York, Ronald Salzer and Anthony DellaventuraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Wong v. TaborIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- Board of Aviation Commissioners v. HestorIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
- Conard v. WaughIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
- Willsey v. Peoples Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of East ChicagoIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- United States v. Tariq B. Shahid, A/K/A Kennis Butler, A/K/A Kenneth A. ButlerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Dietz v. Finlay Fine Jewelry Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- McCae Management Corp. v. Merchants National Bank & Trust Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1990
- Street v. Shoe Carnival, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1996
- Mayes v. City of Hammond, InDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.