Legal Opinion

Califore v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 23, 1935No. 43010PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParsons, J.

This is a matter arising under the Workmen’s Compensation Act (Code 1931, section 1361 et seq.) on the complaint of Nancy Califore. Her husband, Fred Califore, had sustained personal injuries arising out of and in the course of his employment at Sioux City, Iowa, with the Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Company. The answer of the railway company admitted that the claimant was the widow of Fred Califore, who was employed by the defendant prior to his death, and claimed that the matter was governed by the United States law regulating the obligations of common carriers, and the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Shanks v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. HarringtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Erie Railroad v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Erie Railroad v. SzarySupreme Court of the United States · 1920

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Wood v. Central Sand & Gravel Co.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1940
  2. Continental Casualty Company v. James A. Jackson and William R. Jackson, by His Brother and Next Friend, James A. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
  3. DeLong Ex Rel. Sampson v. Iowa State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
  4. Schneberger v. State Board of Social WelfareSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
  5. Schmidt v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1952

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API