McKenzie v. Pierce
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1DissentPaul E. Danielson, Justice
The majority opinion delivered today demonstrates that extraordinary writs will no longer be issued on an extraordinary basis, but instead at the whim of this court. Simply because the majority has itself deemed the records at issue privileged and therefore believes the circuit court erred in denying Mr. McKenzie’s motion to quash, it issues an extraordinary writ, a decision that flies in the face of this court’s precedent. Because I believe the instant facts do not warrant the issuance of a writ, I respectfully dissent.
As an initial matter, I feel compelled to develop further the procedural…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lupo v. LinebergerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- Ford Motor Co. v. HarperSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- Chiodini v. LockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
- Kraemer v. PattersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- Mountain Pure, LLC v. Little Rock Wastewater UtilitySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.