Legal Opinion

Mather v. Northcutt

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 27, 1992No. 91-02280PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THREADGILL, Judge.

The appellants, plaintiffs below, challenge the dismissal with prejudice of those counts of their second amended complaint, which alleged negligence against Appellees U-Haul of West Coast Florida, Inc. and Don Olson Firestone, Inc., for failure to state a cause of action. We affirm the dismissal of U-Haul but reverse the dismissal of Firestone.

To state a cause of action in negligence, a complaint must allege ultimate facts which establish a relationship between the parties giving rise to a legal duty in the defendant to protect the plaintiff from the injury of which he now…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McCain v. Florida Power CorporationSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  2. Navajo Circle, Inc. v. Development Concepts Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  3. Sapp v. City of TallahasseeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  4. Fontainebleau Hotel Corp. v. WaltersSupreme Court of Florida · 1971
  5. Ankers v. DISTRICT SCH. BD. OF PASCODistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Roessler v. NovakDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  2. Fuentes v. Sandel, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  3. Sorenson v. Professional Compounding Pharmacists of Western Pennsylvania, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API