Legal Opinion

Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Kuchta

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 8, 1988No. 1331PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KARWACKI, Judge.

The Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company (B & 0) appeals from the decision of the Circuit Court for Baltimore City (Kaplan, J.) that B & 0 was liable to the City of Baltimore for the reasonable and necessary costs associated with the *3reconstruction of Bridge 5A (the Bridge) which carries Washington Boulevard over the B & 0 tracks near Morrell Park. Judge Kaplan found that those costs totaled $946,-430.58 and entered judgment in that amount in favor of the Mayor and City Council of Baltimore and its Director of Public Works, the appellees.

This dispute between Baltimore City and B…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. STATE OF MINNESOTA Ex Rel. THE CITY OF DULUTHSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. Eyler v. County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1878
  4. Chesapeake & Ohio Canal Co. v. County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1881
  5. Northern Central Railway Co. v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1877

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. HOME BUILDERS ASS'N v. City of MaricopaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  2. Starke v. StarkeCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  3. CSX Transp., Inc. v. Mayor & City Council of BaltimoreDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1991
  4. Home Builders Association v. City of MaricopaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API