Legal Opinion

Sumrall v. State

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 1950No. 37515PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*762The original opinion, withdrawn in part, was as follows:

Lee, J.

Sumrall had been in possession of the land involved in this suit for two or three years. It was in sixteenth section, and he presumed that his title rested on a 99 year lease. Moreover, he had heard that the lease would expire in 1948. Consequently, in 1947, he made application to the Board of Supervisors of Walthall County for a twenty-five year lease of said land. The board, at its January 1948 meeting, approved a ten year lease to him; but the transaction was not consummated. In the meantime he secured the services of an…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hinton v. Perry CountyMississippi Supreme Court · 1904
  2. In Re Savannah Special Consolidated School DistrictMississippi Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Johnson v. Board of SupervisorsMississippi Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Wolford v. WilliamsMississippi Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Foster v. Jefferson CountyMississippi Supreme Court · 1947

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ball v. MartinMississippi Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Creekmore v. Neshoba CountyMississippi Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Burkley v. Jefferson CountyMississippi Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Reese v. MayoMississippi Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Burrage v. Lauderdale CountyMississippi Supreme Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API