Reese v. Mayo
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLee, J.
The pleadings in this cause, by John D. Reese and others, as complainants, and the State, Hinds County, and Robert M. Mayo, Comity Superintendent of Education, as defendants, presented the sole issue of whether or not the complainants are the owners in fee simple of the 160 acres of 16th Section lands, in Hinds County, here in question. At the conclusion of the evidence, the chancellor dismissed the original bill, and confirmed the fee title to the said lands in the State as prayed for in the cross-bill. The complainants appeal.
The proof showed that patents to these lands were executed by S.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Foster v. Jefferson CountyMississippi Supreme Court · 1947
- Jones v. Gulf Refining Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1947
- Sumrall v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1950
3Cited by3 opinions
- Creekmore v. Neshoba CountyMississippi Supreme Court · 1953
- Ladner v. LadnerMississippi Supreme Court · 1958
- Ladner v. LadnerMississippi Supreme Court · 1958