Afflerbaugh v. Geo. Grede & Bro.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCrownhart, J.
Under the circumstances of this case it was sufficient, for the plaintiff to establish a prima facie case, to show that an unexplained fire occurred in the garage where his car was left for repairs, and the car damaged thereby. Milwaukee M. & A. G. Works v. C., M. & St. P. R. Co. 148 Wis. 173, 134 N. W. 379; Hildebrand v. Carroll, 106 Wis. 324, 82 N. W. 145. But this rule does not change the burden of proof. Rost v. Roberts, 180 Wis. 207, 192 N. W. 38. It amounts to no more than the requirement that the bailee for hire shall affirmatively overcome the presumption of negligence in the care of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Rost v. RobertsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
- Hildebrand v. CarrollWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
- Milwaukee Mirror & Art Glass Works v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
3Cited by5 opinions
- Prettyman v. Hopkins Motor Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1954
- Bean v. Security Fur Storage Warehouse, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
- National Fire Ins. Co. v. MoganOregon Supreme Court · 1949
- Redfoot v. J. T. Jenkins Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
- National Fire Insurance v. City of Green BayDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1965