Legal Opinion

Edward Barron Estate Co. v. Waterman

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 23, 1916No. Civ. No. 1807PublishedCited by 8 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLennon, P. J.

This is an action for rent, and the only point presented in support of the plaintiff’s appeal from the judgment entered in favor of the defendants involves the construction of certain clauses of a lease executed by the M. Fisher Company to the defendants on December 12, 1908, of certain premises in a building which was then in course of construction. Although the lease at the outset granted the demised premises to the defendants “for the period of five years commencing on the 15th day of January, 1909, and ending on the 14th day of January, 1914, at the monthly rental of $250,” nevertheless,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People's Trust Co. v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Medico-Dental Building Co. v. Horton & ConverseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Parker v. the Lewis Grocery Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Lang v. Pacific Brewing & Malting Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
  4. Pappadatos v. Market Street Building Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. Fricke v. BradenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API