Taylor v. . Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtOlaeksoN, J.
The defendant, Home Insurance Company, prays the court to decide: (1) That the plaintiffs should be nonsuited for failure to prove due filing of proofs of loss. (2) If the plaintiffs should not be nonsuited, that the judgment should be modified by reducing the recovery to $1,200. We think the findings of fact in the court below, which were supported by the evidence, are such that the contentions above set forth by the defendant Home Insurance Company, cannot be sustained.
Defendant contends that plaintiff proved neither due filing of proof of loss nor waiver thereof. We think the theory on…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gerringer v. North Carolina Home InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
- Parker v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Proffitt Mercantile Co. v. State Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
3Cited by7 opinions
- Misskelley v. Home Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- State v. . BentleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- Mitchell v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- Smith v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- State v. BentleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.