Legal Opinion

Williams v. Wheels, Inc

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1979No. Docket 63207PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The question posed for review in the instant matter is whether, in this action for damages brought pursuant to the no-fault act, 1 the defense attorney’s remarks in closing argument concerning the impact of this case upon the continued viability of the no-fault scheme in Michigan were improper and served to deny the plaintiff a fair trial. We answer that question in the affirmative.

I

On September 3, 1976, the plaintiff was a passenger in a car driven by defendant Laurie Sue Lougheed. The car was owned by defendant Wheels, Inc. There was a collision with another vehicle as a result of which the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Mitcham v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Moore v. SpanglerMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Elliott v. A. J. Smith Contracting Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Wayne County Board of Road Commissioners v. GLS LeascoMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Koepel v. St. Joseph HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 1968

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Schaible v. Michigan Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Falconer v. SalliotteMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Schaible v. Michigan Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API