Williams v. Wheels, Inc
Michigan Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The question posed for review in the instant matter is whether, in this action for damages brought pursuant to the no-fault act, 1 the defense attorney’s remarks in closing argument concerning the impact of this case upon the continued viability of the no-fault scheme in Michigan were improper and served to deny the plaintiff a fair trial. We answer that question in the affirmative.
I
On September 3, 1976, the plaintiff was a passenger in a car driven by defendant Laurie Sue Lougheed. The car was owned by defendant Wheels, Inc. There was a collision with another vehicle as a result of which the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Mitcham v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
- Moore v. SpanglerMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
- Elliott v. A. J. Smith Contracting Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1960
- Wayne County Board of Road Commissioners v. GLS LeascoMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
- Koepel v. St. Joseph HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 1968
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Schaible v. Michigan Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
- Falconer v. SalliotteMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
- Schaible v. Michigan Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982