Legal Opinion

Kane v. SOUTH CENTRAL BELL TEL. CO., INC.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 26, 1979No. 77-394PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Does the gradual inhalation of paint fumes constitute an "accident" as that word is used in the Workmen's Compensation Act? We answer in the affirmative, and affirm the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendant employer on this aspect of the employee's claim.

Appellant, Theresa Kane, had been an employee of the Bell System for several years, and at the time of her alleged injury was working in Birmingham. In February, 1976, she was transferred into a room which was in the process of being renovated. She claimed that filing cabinets located nearby were being painted in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. City of Tuscaloosa v. HowardCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1975
  2. Gentry v. Swann Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  3. Pow v. Southern Const. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  4. BF Goodrich Company v. MartinCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1971
  5. Young v. City of HuntsvilleCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1976

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Ex Parte HarrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  2. American Cyanamid v. ShepherdCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1995
  3. Gattis v. NTN-Bower Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1993
  4. Trinity Industries, Inc. v. CunninghamCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1995
  5. Martin Industries, Inc. v. DementCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1983

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API