Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Quested

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 26, 2015No. 106805Published

1DissentNuss, C.J.

Thirty years ago this court expressly declared that “[i]n Kansas, sentencing of an individual is strictly controlled by statute.” State v. Osbey, 238 Kan. 280, 288, 710 P. 2d 676 (1985). This court has *286never disavowed this declaration. Indeed, we have often repeated it as a ruling principle.

“Control” has been defined as “[t]o exercise authority or dominating influence over; direct; regulate.” The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language 290 (1971). “Strictly” has been defined as “closely, precisely, rigorously; stringently.” Black’s Law Dictionary 1591 (rev. 4th ed. 1968). In a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
  2. In re CaldwellOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. S.G.W. v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  4. State v. OsbeySupreme Court of Kansas · 1985
  5. State v. HughesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API