Legal Opinion

State v. Mbacke

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 4, 2011No. COA09-1395Published

1Opinion of the Court

703 S.E.2d 823 (2011)

STATE of North Carolina

v.

Omar Sidy MBACKE, Defendant.

No. COA09-1395.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

January 4, 2011.

Attorney General Roy A. Cooper, by Assistant Attorney General Martin T. McCracken, for the State.

Tin Fulton Walker & Owen, PLLC, by Noell P. Tin and Matthew G. Pruden, Charlotte, for Defendant-Appellant.

McGEE, Judge.

Omar Sidy Mbacke (Defendant) appeals from the trial court's order denying his motion for appropriate relief. For the following reasons, we reverse.

I. Factual Background and Procedural History

Defendant was indicted on 12 May 2008 for…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API