Legal Opinion

Fort Scott Public Utilities Co. v. Armour

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 12, 1924No. 24,906PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

MARSHALL, J.:

In this action the plaintiff seeks to enj din the defendants from selling property levied on by the sheriff under a tax warrant issued by the county treasurer to collect a tax levied by the city of Fort Scott to pay for paving that portion of certain streets in the city between street-car rails and eighteen inches on each side of the street-car track. Judgment was rendered in favor of the defendants, and the plaintiff appeals.

The city of Fort Scott granted to the Fort Scott Gas & Electric Company, its successors and assigns, a franchise to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Potwin Place v. Topeka Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1893
  2. Citizens Railway & Light Co. v. JohnsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
  3. State Ex Rel. City of Waterbury v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1909
  4. Township of Grosse Pointe v. Detroit & Lake St. Clair RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Reynolds v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Public Utilities Commission v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API