State v. Gerhardt
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.
Defendant appeals an amended judgment of conviction for strangulation, ORS 163.187, challenging the trial court’s order that he pay restitution for attorney fees that the court found that the victim had incurred as a result of the strangulation. Defendant contends that the trial court erred in awarding restitution because the attorney fees were not incurred as a result of the strangulation but, rather, as a result of defendant’s persistent violation of a no-contact order that a court had entered after defendant’s arrest. We agree with defendant and reverse the restitution award.
The facts are…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. PumphreyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- State v. StephensCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- State v. DotyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
- State v. RamosCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- State v. BullockCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. GerhardtOregon Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. ChristyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- State v. GerhardtOregon Supreme Court · 2016