Legal Opinion

United States v. Maio

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided November 26, 2001No. 00-40024-25-SACPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

CROW, Senior District Judge.

This case comes before the court on defendant Rudolph Maio’s motion to suppress vehicle search (Dk.724). No defendants have specifically joined in this motion, and none has standing to do so. Maio’s motion seeks to suppress all physical evidence seized from the pickup truck he was driving on February 22, 2000, as well as from the Honda motorcycle hauled in the bed of that pickup, all statements he made at the scene or soon thereafter, and all observations of law enforcement officers relating to the stop.

Facts

On February 22, 2000, defendant Maio…

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Baltimore v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2003
  2. Gonzales v. City of Topeka, KansasDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2002
  3. United States v. WhiteDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API