Legal Opinion

Board of Supervisors v. DeGroff Enterprises, Inc.

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided August 30, 1973No. Record 8118PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarman, J.

The question presented by this appeal is the validity of amendment 156 (the amendment) to the Fairfax County Zoning Ordinance (ordinance) which became effective on September 1, 1971.

When the amendment, which consists of 39 typewritten pages, is stripped of detail, it requires the developer of fifty or more dwelling units in five zoning districts (RT-5, RTC-5, RT-10, RTC-10 and RM-2G) to commit himself, before rezoning or site plan approval, to build at least 15% of these dwelling units as low and moderate in come housing within the definitions promulgated from time to time by the Fairfax…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. West Bros. Brick Co. v. City of AlexandriaSupreme Court of Virginia · 1937
  2. Mumpower v. Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Virginia · 1940
  3. Board of County Supervisors v. CarperSupreme Court of Virginia · 1959
  4. Board of County Sup'rs of Fairfax County v. DavisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1958
  5. Boggs v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Southern Burlington County N.A.A.C.P. v. Township of Mount LaurelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  2. Oakwood at Madison, Inc. v. Township of MadisonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
  3. Board of Sup'rs of Fairfax County v. AllmanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1975
  4. Infants v. Virginia Housing Development AuthoritySupreme Court of Virginia · 1980
  5. Raum v. Board of SupervisorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API