Legal Opinion

Orr v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided April 15, 1932No. 8408PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OTIS, District Judge.

Plaintiff and defendant entered into a contract of life insurance September 22, 1920’. Among others are certain provisions of the contract, dealing with the subject of “benefits in the event of total and permanent disability before (the) ago (of) sixty.” These provisions, so far as they need bo here set out, are as follows:

“If the insured, after payment of premiums for at least one full year, shall, before attaining the age of sixty years and provided all past due premiums have been duly paid and this policy is in full force and effect, furnish due proof to the company at…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bergholm v. Peoria Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Minnesota Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Crim v. National Life & Accident Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  2. Landry v. Mutual Life Ins.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1944
  3. Western Casualty & Surety Co. v. D & J Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1986
  4. Crim v. National Life & Accident Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  5. Irelan v. Standard Mutual Association of CassvilleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API