Legal Opinion
Grosse Pointe Law Firm, PC v. Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided September 22, 2016No. Docket 326312PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGadola, J.
This case requires us to examine the distinction between warranties and remedies under Michigan’s Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), MCL 440.1101 et seq. Plaintiff, The Grosse Pointe Law Firm, PC, appeals by leave granted1 orders granting the motions for summary disposition filed by defendants Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC (JLRNA), Rover Motors of Farmington Hills LLC (Rover Motors), and Jaguar/Land Rover of Macomb, LLC (Land Rover of Macomb). We reverse and remand for further proceedings.
*398I. BACKGROUND FACTS
Plaintiff purchased a vehicle from Rover Motors on December 30, 2005. The vehicle…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Dextrom v. Wexford CountyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
- Neibarger v. Universal Coopertives, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1992
- Johnson v. ReccaMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Old Republic InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Kenworth of Indianapolis, Inc. v. Seventy-Seven Limited, Convey All, LLC, Keller Trucking, Inc., K&K Aggregate, Inc., Huber Transport, LLC, Triple H Trucking, LLC, and Custom Hauling, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2018
- Carhartt, Inc. v. Innovative Textiles, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020
- Cooper-Standard Automotive Inc. v. Daikin America, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021
- Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company of Michigan v. Haier America Company, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2023
- Grundy v. FCA US LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2023
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.