Legal Opinion

McDaniel v. Springfield Waterworks Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 16, 1892PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from the Greene Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

The plajntiffs. are partners, engaged in keeping a livery stable in the city of Springfield in this state. The defendant is a corporation engaged, as the assignee of a franchise .granted by the city of Springfield to one Perkins, in supplying the inhabitants of that city with water. This is a su-i-t-iu eq-aityior an injunction — t-O' restrain the defendants from cutting off the supply of water from, the , Every etablerofThe plaintiffs. The court granted a provisional injunction, but dissolved it on final hearing, and the plaintiffs prosecute this appeal.

The franchise, .was granted To Perkins…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Davison v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Turner v. Revere Water Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
  2. Sims v. Alabama Water Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  3. Burke v. City of Water ValleyMississippi Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Steele v. Clinton Electric Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
  5. Carter v. the Suburban Water Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1917

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API