Legal Opinion
Doe No. 16297 v. Sex Offender Registry Board
Massachusetts Superior Court
Decided September 27, 2006No. 20053854APublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Sikora, Mitchell J., J.
RULINGS
The court has considered the motion of the plaintiff John Doe No. 16297 for judgment on the pleadings; the cross motion of the defendant Sex Offender Registry Board (“SORB”) for judgment on the pleadings; the memoranda of law of both parties; the administrative record; and the oral arguments submitted by counsel for all parties at hearing.
The court now DENIES plaintiff John Doe’s motion for judgment on the pleadings. It ALLOWS defendant SORB’s cross motion for judgment on the pleadings.
ORDER FOR JUDGMENT
Judgment of affirmance of the administrative determination…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Smith v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- New Boston Garden Corp. v. Board of AssessorsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- Commonwealth v. BrunoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Doe v. Sex Offender Registry BoardMassachusetts Superior Court · 2011