Legal Opinion

Security State Bank v. Burnstad Farmers Elevator Co.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 1, 1930PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurr, J.

The plaintiff sues for the conversion of grain upon which it claims a mortgage. Judgment was rendered in its favor, and from the order denying a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial the defendants appeal.

Appellants say the evidence is insufficient to sustain the judgment in several respects, one of which is that plaintiff did not surrender to the mortgagor a correct copy of the chattel mortgage with the acknowledgment shown thereon; and allege this defect is fatal so that the filing of the mortgage failed to constitute notice, and that they had no actual notice…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pease v. MagillNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Donovan v. St. Anthony & Dakota Elevator Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Swords v. Occident Elevator Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1924
  4. J. I. Case Threshing Machine Co. v. OlsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Keith v. HaggartNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1891

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Drewes v. Security State Bank of Wishek (In Re Nies)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. North Dakota · 1995
  2. Lakota Mercantile Co. v. BalsleyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Tenney Co. v. ThomasNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Baird v. Wilton Elevator Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API